On October 10, P&G will hold their 2023 AGM.

In addition to three shareholder proposals, the company is facing a ‘vote-no’ campaign. Uniquely, the genesis of this campaign isn’t from an investor nonprofit group like Majority Action: Nine descendants of the P&G founders filed a solicitation for investors this morning urging them to vote against the CEO, LID, Chair of the Gov and Public Responsibility Committee, as well as the longest tenured director. Their primary reasoning? “[F]ailure to respond to shareholder concerns regarding risks posed by forest degradation,” which, they argue, is “…a failure of strategy and corporate governance.”




Here’s the deforestation shareholder proposal, referenced in the solicitation, that received overwhelming support at the 2020 AGM:


This isn’t the first time these descendants have publicly come out against the company—but it is the first formal vote-no campaign they’ve filed via exempt solicitation, it appears.
**Disclaimer**
The information provided in this blog/email is for general informational purposes only. While I strive to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the content, I make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to the blog or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the blog for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
Opinions and Views: All posts and opinions expressed on this blog are solely my own and do not reflect the opinions or views of my employer. The content shared here is a representation of my personal thoughts and insights on various topics, and should not be considered as professional advice or the official stance of any organization. Please use your discretion and consult with relevant experts before making any decisions based on the information provided on this blog/email.